Political Violence Update

Posted by on March 29, 2013 | Be the First to Comment

War & Terrorism - Spring 2013The major news for the Terror/Political Violence market in London is the re-emergence of underwriters Stephen Ashwell at XL and David James at ANV. With Chris Kirby also starting at IGI we have three new markets for terrorism and political violence risks in London. Insurance Day has published a commentary from our Lockton team on the war and terrorism market, and you can see a detailed report on the political violence market globally read my War and Terrorism Update

Print Friendly

Terrorism Risk: A Continuing Threat

Posted by on February 27, 2013 | Be the First to Comment

Before the attack on the U.S. on September 11, 2001, terrorism was traditionally included under most “Special” (also known as “All-Risk”) property and liability policies in the U.S. as a covered peril.  However, after the September 11 attack, insurance markets have not been willing to cover this extraordinary risk.

The U.S. Congress enacted the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) in November 2002, providing a vital backstop for terrorism risk insurance.  Since that initial enactment in 2002, the terrorism risk insurance program has been revised and extended twice.  More than a decade later, 9/11 remains the worst U.S. terrorist act in terms of fatalities and insured property losses.

While terrorism risk is changing, it continues to be an evolving and ongoing threat for the foreseeable future. Failure to focus on and prepare for this threat will come at an enormous cost to the millions of individuals and businesses who rely on insurance contracts to offset the overall economic impact of a terrorist attack.

As TRIA has evolved, private insurers and businesses have assumed a greater share of their terrorism risk.  The current program – The Terrorism Risk Insurance  Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 (TRIPRA) – is slated to expire at the end of 2014, which could significantly undermine the terrorism risk insurance market.

The Insurance Information Institute has recently published a white paper outlining the way that TRIPRA, the U.S. terrorism backstop works, and its importance to the overall economy and the real estate and development markets specifically.

We support renewal of TRIPRA, and look forward to working with clients and public officials to structure a terrorism risk insurance program that makes sense for the long-term health of our economy.

Print Friendly

War & Terrorism Update: The View from London

Posted by on January 17, 2013 | Be the First to Comment

The Political Violence market remains in a flat and stable state. Minor reductions are still being offered on the least exposed of risks, dependent on situation and occupancy, for the tightened coverage of Sabotage and Terrorism only. Higher rating continues to be realised on the broader cover in delicate and volatile countries for Full Political Violence.

Although not reported in the news on a regular daily basis as has been commonplace in recent months, the uprising in Syria continues to escalate, with the UN estimating that over 60,000 people have been killed. With no peaceful end in sight, more than 2,500,000 people have now been displaced from their homesteads, with humanitarian efforts to assist them being hindered by the dire risks being faced by the aid workers trying to secure safe passage for the Syrian people fleeing the hostilities.

The fighting in major cities such as Damascus, Homs and Aleppo continues unabated, where in almost 2 years of fighting in Syria, these cities in particular have seen intense conflict between Government and opposition forces, with neither side being able to force the other to retreat.

In other parts of the world on January 15th 2013 a powerful suicide car bomb struck the local headquarters for the party of a key Kurdish leader in the disputed Iraqi city of Kirkuk, killing at least four people and injuring dozens of others. The Kurdish Democratic Party is led by Massoud Barzani, the president of Iraq’s largely autonomous Kurdish region, who has frequently sparred with Iraq’s central governor in Baghdad. The blast comes amid rising tensions among Iraq’s ethnic and sectarian divide, between  Arabs, Kurds and Turkomen, who all have competing claims to the area which contains vast reserves of oil.

The ceasefire between Israel and Gaza continues but with periodical pockets of trouble erupting. In early January a 21 year old Palestinian was shot dead by Israeli troops while trying to cross the barrier near the Southern West Bank town of Dura. Israel maintains that the barrier is meant to protect it from militant attack. Palestinians regard it as a means to take land inside the West Bank.

Outside of the Middle East a roadside bomb killed 14 Pakistani soldiers and wounded 20 more in the troubled north-western province of North Waziristan, an area said to be a stronghold of Taliban militants. Pakistan’s tribal regions have long been used as bases by both local militants and al-Qaeda.

In Colombia Tarc rebels say that their ceasefire will end on Sunday 20th January, as peace talks with the Government of Colombia start up again.

The most recent news however, involves the taking hostage of several foreign nationals in a gas facility in Amenas, Algeria. The complex is operated by the Algerian state oil company, Sonatrach, along with BP and Norways’s Statol.

A heavily armed “terrorist group”  Belmohtar – the Khaled Abu al-Abbas brigade and the Signed-in-Blood Battalion are believed to be behind the kidnapping. However, al-Qaeda links are also said to be a possibility. Before the hostages were held in the east wing of the compound, the attackers ambushed a bus killing a Briton and an Algerian. UK Foreign Secretary William Hague confirmed the captives included “a number of British nationals”, adding that this was a “very dangerous situation and the UK Government was working around the clock to resolve the crisis.” As this Market Update was filed, there were further press reports of an escape and the numbers involved remain unclear, but some 30-40 Algerians and 15-20 foreign nationals are believed to have escaped.

In Africa, Mali is the latest failed state of choice for the discerning al-Qaeda terrorist subsidiary but (re)insurance markets are likely to escape the current turmoil largely unscathed since large corporations including a number of mining giants have previously announced  that they had no political risk cover in the region. In the long-term, however, Mali may offer cover and training to Islamist terrorist organizations in much the same way that Afghanistan did to Osama Bin-Laden. Mali will no doubt come under increasing scrutiny from national security establishments, assuming of course that France and her allies fail to drive al-Qaeda-linked groups out of the territory over the coming months.

Contact me for more information on the global War and Terrorism insurance market.

 

 

 
 

 

Print Friendly

Global Terrorism Remains a Grave Threat to Business

Posted by on October 18, 2012 | Be the First to Comment

There has been no significant influx of new entrants to the terrorism and political violence arena during the current year. Daily headlines of the dire events in Syria and the Middle East are keeping underwriters in a state of alert; but, with no major insured losses to report, insurers and reinsurers alike remain broadly content to keep a watching brief.

The most prominent feature of the Arab Spring to date, however, is that the voice of the people has emerged as a far more powerful phenomenon. Fragile new regimes are still learning how to cope with highly vocal popular pressure, often mobilised and orchestrated by radical groups. Ominously, the conflict in Syria is almost certain to deepen sectarian divisions both within the country and across the Arab world.

The rapidity with which the violence has escalated in several Middle Eastern countries around the anniversary date of the 9/11 attacks, exacerbated by a highly inflammatory anti-Islamic film “Innocence of Muslims”, has reignited simmering tensions in these brittle new democracies, including attacks on US embassies in Tunisia, Sudan, Cairo and Yemen. 

Indeed so controversial has the film proved to be that the wave of unrest and bad feeling surrounding its unpopularity has spread to Australia and Europe.

In Iraq, a series of bombings across the country on 16 August killed more than 50 people and injured nearly 250 more. These bombings followed a series of coordinated attacks on security forces and Shia civilians on 23 July, which killed more than 100. Sunni Islamist militants have been responsible for most of the terrorist attacks currently taking place in this territory, with security forces, government officials and buildings, and Shia civilians the main targets.
 
Continue reading for updates on insurance markets and terrorism in other regions of the world. 

 

Print Friendly

Political Risk Underwriters Keep Capacity Constrained in the Middle East

Posted by on April 12, 2012 | Be the First to Comment

The political violence market remains cautious for business in the Middle East with newspaper columns headlined daily with news of Syria as it stands on the brink of civil war. The blame for the bloodshed rests on the shoulders of its president Bashar al-Assad, with the death toll now rising to more than of 7,000 people. It appears that sectarian tensions could flare out of control in a country that up until now has been a model of secular tolerance.

The situation is exacerbated by the fact that Syria sits on the fault line of one of the world’s most volatile regions, with neighbours that include Israel, Iraq, and Lebanon, and there is fear among diplomats that civil war could turn rapidly into a proxy war.

According to reports, neither Washington, particularly with President Obama looking toward the November election, nor London want to get embroiled in committing ground forces.  The only real hope currently is that another round of dogged diplomacy can stop the alleged atrocities being carried out by this regime.

The London market continues to see an increase in the number of submissions for business in this country, with few markets looking to commit capacity for full political violence at the moment. Underwriters who are prepared to “take the risk” do so with high rates and small participations.  The next six months will see a certain element of caution for most political violence underwriters within the London marketplace.

Read the full report here.

 

 

Print Friendly